![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Masterpiece in miniature See also:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Midbass-Treble Unit in asymmetric coaxial array
Early in the R&D process of the 301.2 coaxial driver the idea was to improve the sound performance of a bass driver based on a predefined enclosure size. The solution came quickly and led to the present oval shape. More difficult was the design and integration of the tweeter. The goal was being compact without compromising sound quality. In search of the ideal position of the tweeter, multiple listening sessions proved that a concentric orientation of both drivers did not deliver acceptable results. This finally led to the asymmetric coaxial array. After further listening tests and multiple measurements it was obvious that a premium and well-balanced solution in this particular case could only be achieved far from what the textbooks would suggest. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||









